![]() |
Asked by llbarton48 {154}
4/11/2010 7:58:14 PM I don't think an ultrasound in of itself poses too many risks, but can it be used too much? What risks are there, if any, to the unborn baby? |
4/12/2010 12:19:57 AM | [0 Votes] Flag as inappropriate |
According to medical studies done there are no links between ultrasound technology and birth defects issues. However, it seems that the studies done on the harmful effects ( if any) of ultrasound have been specifically designed to spot problems during pregnancy and at birth. No studies have been done on the long term effects of children born to mothers who have had multiple ultrasounds. That does not mean that there are problems, only that the science has yet to be proven in this area of child development. |
![]() |
walkinturtle's last statement is one to consider carefully - just because problems haven't been proven doesn't mean they don't exist. If your pregnancy is going well then no reason to have lots of ultrasounds. Some doctors are ultrasound happy for no reason and it IS tempting to see as many as possible because it's fun and exciting. Many insurance plans only allow for two anyway. - textmom 4/12/2010 1:02:31 AM | Flag |
Comments from Facebook | ||
| Kelly Cramer I was getting ultrasounds almost every week when I was prego, due to my high risk pregancy with my identical twins. Now their 2 1/2 and as normal as can be. Monday, July 25, 2011 | ||
| Christine Courville I was having bpp`s twice a week due to high risk pregnancy, my son is now 2 and as normal as can be. Monday, July 25, 2011 | ||
| Tamarra Wagner ditto above two comments. Monday, July 25, 2011 | ||
| Tracey Fiber I agree wth both of the comments above... I had an ultrasound done weekly due to my high risk pregnancy and my 13 mth old is perfectly healthy!!! Monday, July 25, 2011 | ||
| Cheryle Martinez They are not healthy to have so often...if at all :(Current limits in the U.S. have risen dramatically, and now allow intensities of up to 720 mW/cm2 – more than 7 times the limit in 1992. This means we have no large, population-based studies examining the effects of ultrasound at the much higher intensities commonly used today from this article...http://thehealthyskeptic.org/natural-childbirth-iib-ultrasound-not-as-safe-as-commonly-thoughtThere are many studies that show them to not be ve Monday, July 25, 2011 | ||
| Kadie Davis Everyone is entitled to their own opinion - but you can find information to support both sides of the argument. Ain`t the internet grand? I respect your opinion and your right to choose what`s best for you. I, too, was high-risk with my last pregnancy (due to my unfortunate habit of miscarrying in the first trimester). I got U/S`s weekly through week 20, then biweekly through week 30. We have no extra appendages and no mysterious illnesses and no learning disabilities and nothing odd at al Monday, July 25, 2011 | ||
| Rebecca Rosenberg Cashman the doctors only get paid for a certain number of them from insurance before having to jump thru virtual hoops to attempt to get paid. Tuesday, July 26, 2011 | ||