![]() |
Asked by monique {167}
4/20/2010 4:35:43 PM I am pregnant with my first child and I want a few more after this one. My husband wants to have a child every two years after this one is born. I don't think it is a good idea, they will be close in age but they also cost a lot of money to take care of. Did anyone have there children close together or waited til the first got older because of the financial cost? |
4/20/2010 4:48:23 PM | [0 Votes] Flag as inappropriate |
Well it all depends on how you look at it ... I have 2 daughters 15 months apart and my 3rd daughter is due in about 3 weeks. Semira is 3 and Novalei is 22 months , it has its challenges but it also has some serious perks. For starters my daughters are the best of friends. They do everything together and its really cute to watch. Now money wise it really didnt hurt us, we passed down most of the toys and clothes, they wear the same size diaper ( well semira is almost out, we are in the middle of potty training). Now that Im having another girl, theres still alot of decent clothes I can pass down and basically all the toys. I prefer to have them close in age, and ill be done having kids quicker. But it also has it moments, they go through the same phases right after each other and if Semira has her temper tantrums or terrible 3 moments Novalei will copy her, so I have 2 kids doing the same thing. I guess we got lucky having all girls because we could pass down alot and we didnt have to shell out a TON of extra money for all new stuff. |
![]() |
Thanks I never thought about the fact that I could pass down the clothes if they are close together. - monique 4/20/2010 5:55:08 PM | Flag |
4/26/2010 11:20:01 AM | [0 Votes] Flag as inappropriate |
I really think it's all on how you look at it as well. When I was growing up, my sisters and brothers were all much older then me, ranging from 5 years to 15 years older. Being the youngest I ended up getting all their hand-me-down clothes, and I was definatly not in style. My parents had to purchase all new things for me as well, for standards change for babies so quickly. I honestly think keeping them somewhat close in age would be better finacially. I made sure to get as much gender neutrul items, like the car seat, pack N play, stroller, etc. So when we have our second, if it happens to be a girl, then at least we will only need to worry about getting clothes. Even then, you can find some discount stores to purchase the full wardrobe. |
Comments from Facebook | ||
| Michelle Reagin It really depends on you and what`s best I have a 12 year old and a 6month old I love my boys and they love eachother but if I were to have another one I try after my youngest turns 1 so he has a playmate growing up. Someone who likes the same kinda stuff! Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Heather Gansert-Lauriello I have a 4.5 year old son and a 2 month old daughter. Its perfect cuz he got his one on one time with me before his sister came. He also likes to help me with her. Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Erin Schreiber I have an almost 8 yr old a 4.5 yr old a 2.5 yr old and a 10 m0 yeah they are pretty close in age. the 3 youngest are girls and are all abt 20-21 months apart. I think it is better t have them close together obviously lol, because you go right into the next feeding diaper changing, i would hate to have my child out of diapers and off the bottle for a long time then have to go back to that hassle. Although the one one time is limited they def have playmates. Like right now three of them are playi Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Tiara Joseph Our 3 & 4 year old boys are 13 months apart. At first it was rough because my husband was deployed for a year, but now I`m glad we had them close `cause they have more love and fun together than I`ve ever seen brothers have. Now we have a 7m old girl and are so happy of our outcome. Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Jennifer Humphrey My boys are 14, 12, 9, & 7. Nice ages. Not to close and not to far apart. I highly recommend having them around that 2 yrs apart. Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Tammy Klein My two oldest are 11 month apart and my third is 2 yrs apart from the middle kid. I love having them close to age bc in the long run its easier and they will always have what in common with their siblings. But its nice to have a break as well gives you more of a chance to see t he things you are doing wrong and fix them by the time the other comes along Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Susan Auten I`ve heard it`s best to wait at least 2 years between pregnancies. We didn`t have that kind of control and None of our four kids are more than 2 1/2 years apart. I love that they are so close both in age and in their relationships with each other. Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Tracie Durre Mine 3 are 11 9 and 1 having them close is good so they have a ready made play mate but having a gap in age is nice too because i have 2 helpers that love their little living Doll to pieces. so i guess it just depends on your views Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Tasha Johnson Mine 14,13 & two 8 yr old.... I love it cause they can grow together.... Plus they love each and would go miles Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Anne Cooper I have a 9 year old and a 9 month old... Each situation depends on the person. I find it a lot easier to care for the baby because I don`t have to constantly worry about the 9 year old, and she is in school all day, so the baby and I get a lot of time together. My oldest wasn`t jealous at all, in fact she took to her right away. She in fact is a HUGE help to me. I do think about the fact that they won`t have a lot in common, but I also think it is great that they have one another, period. I Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Kristy Hamilton mine are 6 yrs apart. There are advantages and disadvantages. I love my boys but I wish the age difference wasn`t so much sometimes. Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Stephanie Price Mine are 14, 8, and 1. My children are very close to each other despite age. I think it is easier when they are spread apart due to the constant attention younger children need as they get older they gain more independence and you can focus on the little one more because they need more attention and time. Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Morerimia Quintanilla Mine are 14, 12, 8, 5, 2 months...my 2 oldest are 2 yrs apart then after that they are 4-5 yrs aparts it`s kind of harder when you have them so close to each other that a way you could give enough time to each one while they are growing.... Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Tamara Mocny I have a 14yr old from my 1st marriage and a 8 yr old from this one. They get along great! as far as finacial cost go, you are never going to not have bills it does not matter how long you wait, you will still have them. Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Lisa M.Sansone Close together Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Amber Hanie mine kids are 7,3,and 2 and my oldest didnt even much care when his brother came along and it was really easy with them. But then i accidently got pregnant when my second was 3 months old and they were 13 months apart and my middle son was so jealous and needy when his sister came along. Tuesday, November 09, 2010 | ||
| Carolyn Addotta-Bravo Mine are 16,13,10,9,4 & 2 I wish I could of slipped 2 more in between my 9 & 4 year old but that`s when I miscarried =( I loved having them close in age! Sunday, November 14, 2010 | ||